17 Feb, 2023

HTTP Host Header Attacks

Vulnerability Assessment as a Service (VAaaS)

Tests systems and applications for vulnerabilities to address weaknesses.

HTTP Host Header Attacks refer to a type of web application attack where an attacker manipulates the Host header field in an HTTP request to inject malicious content into a web page or redirect the user to a different website. The Host header is a part of the HTTP protocol used to specify the target host or server for a particular request. By modifying the Host header, an attacker can make the server believe that the request is coming from a different domain than the actual one, allowing them to bypass security measures and carry out various types of attacks, such as phishing, cross-site scripting (XSS), and cross-site request forgery (CSRF). HTTP Host Header Attacks can be used to exploit vulnerabilities in web applications that use the Host header as part of their security mechanisms or to target shared hosting environments where multiple websites are hosted on the same server.

Example of vulnerable code on different programming languages:


in PHP:

				
					$host = $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'];
$uri = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];
if($host == "example.com"){
    header("Location: http://example.com/home");
}
else {
    header("Location: http://$host$uri");
}

				
			


In the above PHP code, the server redirects the user to the home page if the Host header is equal to “example.com”. However, an attacker can manipulate the Host header to bypass this check and redirect the user to a malicious website.

• in Java:

				
					String host = request.getHeader("Host");
if (host.equals("example.com")) {
    response.sendRedirect("http://example.com/home");
} else {
    String uri = request.getRequestURI();
    response.sendRedirect("http://" + host + uri);
}

				
			


In the above Java code, the server redirects the user to the home page if the Host header is equal to “example.com”. However, an attacker can manipulate the Host header to bypass this check and redirect the user to a malicious website.

• in Python:

				
					from flask import Flask, request, redirect

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.before_request
def redirect_to_home():
    if request.host == 'example.com':
        return redirect('http://example.com/home')

@app.route('/')
def home():
    return 'Welcome to the home page!'

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run()

				
			


In the above Python code, the server redirects the user to the home page if the Host header is equal to “example.com”. However, an attacker can manipulate the Host header to bypass this check and redirect the user to a malicious website.

Examples of exploitation HTTP Host Header Attacks

Phishing: An attacker can manipulate the Host header to make the server believe that a request is coming from a trusted domain, such as a bank’s website. The attacker can then redirect the user to a fake login page that looks like the bank’s website, steal their login credentials, and use them to carry out fraudulent activities.

Cross-site scripting (XSS): An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code into a web page by manipulating the Host header. When the user visits the page, the JavaScript code executes in their browser, allowing the attacker to steal their sensitive information, such as cookies or login credentials.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF): An attacker can manipulate the Host header to trick the user’s browser into sending a request to a vulnerable web application that is authenticated with the user’s credentials. The attacker can then carry out various malicious activities, such as changing the user’s password, making unauthorized transactions, or deleting their data.

Server-side request forgery (SSRF): An attacker can manipulate the Host header to make the server send requests to internal or external resources that are not intended to be accessed by the web application. This can lead to information disclosure, remote code execution, or denial of service attacks.

Privilege escalation techniques for HTTP Host Header Attacks

Accessing restricted resources:
An attacker can manipulate the Host header to bypass access controls and gain access to resources that are not intended to be accessed by their user role. For example, an attacker could manipulate the Host header to access an administrative page or functionality that is only accessible to privileged users.

Impersonating other users:
An attacker can manipulate the Host header to impersonate other users by changing the domain name in the Host header to that of the targeted user. This can allow the attacker to carry out actions on behalf of the targeted user, such as making unauthorized changes or transactions.

CSRF with elevated privileges:
An attacker can manipulate the Host header to carry out CSRF attacks with elevated privileges. This involves making the user’s browser send a request that carries out an action with the user’s credentials, such as changing their password, but with escalated privileges, such as changing the password of an administrator.

Exploiting logic flaws:
An attacker can manipulate the Host header to exploit logic flaws in the web application’s access control mechanisms. For example, an attacker could manipulate the Host header to trick the application into believing that they are a different user or that they have certain privileges that they do not actually have.

General methodology and checklist for HTTP Host Header Attacks

Methodology:

  1. Identify the target application: Determine the target web application and the specific endpoints that are vulnerable to HTTP Host Header Attacks. This can be done using automated scanning tools or by manually inspecting the application’s source code and configuration files.

  2. Craft malicious requests: Use a proxy tool, such as Burp Suite, to craft malicious requests with a modified Host header. The Host header should be modified to contain a different domain name than the actual domain name of the target application.

  3. Observe the server’s response: Submit the malicious requests to the target application and observe the server’s response. If the application is vulnerable, it will respond with unexpected behavior, such as redirecting the user to a different page or returning sensitive information.

  4. Exploit the vulnerability: If the application is vulnerable, attempt to exploit the vulnerability to gain unauthorized access or escalate privileges. This can involve further manipulating the Host header or using other techniques, such as CSRF or XSS.

  5. Report the findings: Document the vulnerability and its impact, and report the findings to the application’s developers or security team. Provide recommendations for remediation and retest after the vulnerability has been fixed.

Checklist:

  1. Identify the target application: Determine the target web application and the specific endpoints that are vulnerable to HTTP Host Header Attacks.

  2. Determine the allowed Host header values: Verify that the application only allows requests with a valid Host header value. Check the application’s configuration files and source code to ensure that the allowed Host header values are defined and enforced.

  3. Test for vulnerabilities: Use a proxy tool, such as Burp Suite, to craft malicious requests with a modified Host header. Submit the requests and observe the server’s response for unexpected behavior, such as redirection to a different page or disclosure of sensitive information.

  4. Test for privilege escalation: If the application is vulnerable, attempt to escalate privileges by manipulating the Host header or using other techniques, such as CSRF or XSS.

  5. Check for defense mechanisms: Verify that the application has implemented proper defense mechanisms, such as input validation and sanitization, to prevent HTTP Host Header Attacks.

  6. Check for access control: Verify that the application has implemented proper access controls to prevent unauthorized access or privilege escalation through HTTP Host Header Attacks.

  7. Report the findings: Document the vulnerability and its impact, and report the findings to the application’s developers or security team. Provide recommendations for remediation and retest after the vulnerability has been fixed.

  8. Retest after remediation: After the vulnerability has been fixed, retest the application to verify that the vulnerability has been successfully mitigated.

Tools set for exploiting HTTP Host Header Attacks

Manual Tools:

  • Burp Suite: A comprehensive web application testing framework that includes a proxy tool for intercepting and modifying HTTP requests, making it a popular tool for manual testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks.

  • Postman: A popular tool for testing web APIs, Postman can be used to manually craft HTTP requests with modified Host headers and observe the server’s response.

  • cURL: A command-line tool for making HTTP requests, cURL can be used to manually craft HTTP requests with modified Host headers and observe the server’s response.

  • Fiddler: A web debugging proxy tool that can be used to manually intercept and modify HTTP requests, including the Host header.

  • Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP): A free and open-source web application scanner that includes a proxy tool for manual testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks.

  • Insomnia: A popular REST client that can be used to manually craft HTTP requests with modified Host headers and observe the server’s response.

Automated Tools:

  • OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP): In addition to its manual testing capabilities, ZAP can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks using its built-in scanning functionality.

  • Nessus: A popular vulnerability scanner that can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks, among other vulnerabilities.

  • Nmap: A network exploration and vulnerability scanning tool that includes functionality for detecting HTTP Host Header vulnerabilities.

  • Acunetix: A popular web vulnerability scanner that can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks, among other vulnerabilities.

  • Netsparker: A web vulnerability scanner that includes functionality for detecting HTTP Host Header vulnerabilities.

  • AppScan: A web application scanner that can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks, among other vulnerabilities.

  • Nikto: A popular web server scanner that includes functionality for detecting HTTP Host Header vulnerabilities.

  • OpenVAS: A free and open-source vulnerability scanner that includes functionality for detecting HTTP Host Header vulnerabilities.

  • Wapiti: A web application vulnerability scanner that can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks, among other vulnerabilities.

  • Arachni: A free and open-source web application security scanner that can be used to automate the testing of HTTP Host Header Attacks, among other vulnerabilities.

Browser Plugins:

  • ModHeader: A browser extension for modifying HTTP headers, including the Host header.

  • HTTP Header Live: A browser extension for inspecting and modifying HTTP headers, including the Host header.

  • Hackbar: A browser extension for testing web application security that includes functionality for modifying HTTP headers, including the Host header.

Average CVSS score of stack HTTP Host Header Attacks

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is a framework for scoring the severity of security vulnerabilities. The CVSS score is a numerical score that ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating a more severe vulnerability. The CVSS score is determined based on several factors, including the likelihood of an attack, the impact of a successful attack, and the level of complexity required to exploit the vulnerability.

The CVSS score of a stack of HTTP Host Header Attacks can vary widely, depending on the specific vulnerability and the context in which it is exploited. Some HTTP Host Header Attacks can be relatively benign, such as causing a web page to load slowly or redirecting to a different page. However, more severe HTTP Host Header Attacks can lead to data leakage, privilege escalation, or complete compromise of the web application.

Therefore, the average CVSS score of a stack of HTTP Host Header Attacks is difficult to determine, as it can vary widely depending on the specific vulnerabilities involved and the impact of their exploitation. It is important to evaluate each vulnerability on a case-by-case basis, taking into account its likelihood, potential impact, and complexity to exploit, to determine an accurate CVSS score.

The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when input data is not properly validated, allowing an attacker to craft malicious input that can be used to exploit vulnerabilities in the target system.

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (‘Cross-site Scripting’): This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when user input is not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code into web pages viewed by other users.

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’): This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when user input is not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject SQL commands into database queries.

CWE-113: HTTP Response Splitting: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an attacker is able to inject special characters into an HTTP response header, causing the server to return two separate responses to the client.

CWE-200: Information Exposure: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an application leaks sensitive information, such as passwords, user data, or server configuration details.

CWE-434: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an attacker is able to upload a file with an unexpected file type, such as an executable file, which can then be executed on the server.

CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (‘Open Redirect’): This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an attacker is able to redirect a user to a malicious website by modifying a URL parameter.

CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an attacker is able to supply a malicious XML document that references an external entity, potentially allowing access to sensitive files or network resources.

CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision: This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an application makes security decisions based on untrusted inputs, such as user input or data received from a third-party source.

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): This CWE describes vulnerabilities that arise when an attacker is able to send a request to a vulnerable server on behalf of the application, potentially allowing access to internal resources or systems.

Top 10 CVES related to HTTP Host Header Attacks

CVE-2022-34362 – IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 230523.

CVE-2022-34306 – IBM CICS TX Standard and Advanced 11.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 229435.

CVE-2022-34165 – IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 22.0.0.9 are vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cache poisoning and cross-site scripting. IBM X-Force ID: 229429.

CVE-2022-34163 – IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 229333.

CVE-2022-27220 – A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.0 SP2). Affected application is missing general HTTP security headers in the web server configured on port 6220. This could aid attackers by making the servers more prone to clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors.

CVE-2022-27219 – A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.0 SP2). Affected application is missing general HTTP security headers in the web server configured on port 443. This could aid attackers by making the servers more prone to clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors.

CVE-2022-26673 – ASUS RT-AX88U has insufficient filtering for special characters in the HTTP header parameter. A remote attacker with general user privilege can exploit this vulnerability to inject JavaScript and perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.

CVE-2022-26616 – PKP Vendor Open Journal System v2.4.8 to v3.3.8 allows attackers to perform reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via crafted HTTP headers.

CVE-2022-22344 – IBM Spectrum Copy Data Management 2.2.0.0 through 2.2.14.3 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 220038

CVE-2022-2179 – The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks.

HTTP Host Header Attacks exploits

Request Smuggling:
This technique involves manipulating the HTTP request and response headers to bypass security controls and trick the server into processing an invalid request. The attacker can then send a subsequent request with a different host header, which may be processed by the server.

HTTP Host Header Forgery:
In this technique, the attacker sends a request to a vulnerable server with a forged host header. The server may then process the request as if it were coming from a trusted domain, which can allow the attacker to access sensitive information or perform actions on behalf of the victim.

HTTP Response Splitting:
This technique involves injecting a newline character into an HTTP response header, causing the server to split the response into two separate responses. The attacker can then inject malicious content into the second response, which may be displayed to the user.

Open Redirect:
In this technique, the attacker uses a vulnerable redirect function to redirect the user to a malicious website. This is typically done by modifying the target URL to include the attacker’s domain.

Cache Poisoning:
This technique involves injecting malicious content into a server’s cache, which can then be served to other users. The attacker can then use the cache to serve malicious content to unsuspecting users.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):
This technique involves injecting malicious code into a website, which can then be executed by other users. The attacker can use this technique to steal user credentials, perform actions on behalf of the victim, or spread malware.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF):
This technique involves tricking the user into performing an action on a website that they did not intend to. The attacker can use this technique to steal user credentials or perform actions on behalf of the victim.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF):
In this technique, the attacker is able to send a request to a vulnerable server on behalf of the application. This can allow the attacker to access internal resources or systems.

DNS Spoofing:
This technique involves forging DNS responses to redirect traffic to a malicious website. The attacker can then use this technique to steal user credentials or perform actions on behalf of the victim.

Clickjacking:
In this technique, the attacker overlays a transparent layer over a website, which can be used to trick the user into clicking on a hidden link or button. The attacker can then use this technique to steal user credentials or perform actions on behalf of the victim.

Practicing in test for HTTP Host Header Attacks

Use a vulnerable web application:
Many intentionally vulnerable web applications are available online for practicing web application security testing. You can use one of these applications to practice testing for HTTP Host Header Attacks. Some examples include Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA), WebGoat, and Mutillidae.

Set up your own vulnerable web application:
You can also set up your own vulnerable web application to practice testing for HTTP Host Header Attacks. There are many resources available online for creating your own web application, and you can intentionally introduce vulnerabilities to the application to practice testing.

Use a web application scanner:
Web application scanners like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite can be used to scan for vulnerabilities, including HTTP Host Header Attacks. You can use these tools to scan a vulnerable web application or your own web application to identify potential vulnerabilities.

Write your own exploit:
If you have programming skills, you can try writing your own exploit for a vulnerable web application. This can help you understand the vulnerabilities better and also give you more practice with web application security testing.

Join a Capture the Flag (CTF) event:
CTF events often include web application security challenges that can involve HTTP Host Header Attacks. Joining a CTF event can give you the opportunity to practice testing for HTTP Host Header Attacks and other web application security vulnerabilities in a competitive and collaborative environment.

For study HTTP Host Header Attacks

OWASP: The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) is a non-profit organization that provides resources for improving web application security. The OWASP website has a section dedicated to HTTP Host Header Attacks, which includes information on vulnerabilities, attack scenarios, and mitigation strategies.

Web Security Academy: The Web Security Academy is a free online training program offered by PortSwigger, the company behind the Burp Suite web application scanner. The academy includes a section on HTTP Host Header Attacks, which covers the different types of attacks and how to test for them.

Books: There are many books available on web application security that cover HTTP Host Header Attacks. Some examples include “Web Application Security: A Beginner’s Guide” by Bryan Sullivan and Vincent Liu, “The Web Application Hacker’s Handbook: Finding and Exploiting Security Flaws” by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto, and “Black Hat Python: Python Programming for Hackers and Pentesters” by Justin Seitz.

Online tutorials and courses: There are many online tutorials and courses available on web application security that cover HTTP Host Header Attacks. Some examples include “Web Application Penetration Testing” by Udemy, “Web Security Essentials” by Pluralsight, and “Web Application Security for Developers” by LinkedIn Learning.

Online forums and communities: There are many online forums and communities dedicated to web application security where you can ask questions, share knowledge, and discuss HTTP Host Header Attacks. Some examples include the OWASP Community, Reddit’s r/netsec, and the HackerOne Community.

Books with review of HTTP Host Header Attacks

“The Web Application Hacker’s Handbook: Finding and Exploiting Security Flaws” by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto: This book is considered a classic in the field of web application security. It covers a wide range of web application vulnerabilities, including HTTP Host Header Attacks, and provides practical guidance on identifying and exploiting these vulnerabilities.

“Web Application Security: A Beginner’s Guide” by Bryan Sullivan and Vincent Liu: This book is a good introduction to web application security for beginners. It covers the basics of web application security, including common vulnerabilities like HTTP Host Header Attacks, and provides step-by-step guidance on testing for these vulnerabilities.

“Black Hat Python: Python Programming for Hackers and Pentesters” by Justin Seitz: This book is focused on using Python for offensive security. It includes a chapter on web application security, which covers HTTP Host Header Attacks and other common vulnerabilities.

“Web Hacking 101: How to Make Money Hacking Ethically” by Peter Yaworski: This book is aimed at beginner to intermediate level readers who want to learn about web application security. It includes a chapter on HTTP Host Header Attacks, which provides practical guidance on identifying and exploiting these vulnerabilities.

“Breaking into Information Security: Learning the Ropes 101” by Josh More and Anthony J. Stieber: This book is aimed at individuals who want to break into the field of information security. It includes a chapter on web application security, which covers HTTP Host Header Attacks and other common vulnerabilities.

“Gray Hat Hacking: The Ethical Hacker’s Handbook” by Allen Harper, Daniel Regalado, and Ryan Linn: This book covers a wide range of offensive security topics, including web application security. It includes a chapter on HTTP Host Header Attacks, which provides practical guidance on identifying and exploiting these vulnerabilities.

“The Basics of Web Hacking: Tools and Techniques to Attack the Web” by Josh Pauli: This book is a practical guide to web application security. It covers a wide range of web application vulnerabilities, including HTTP Host Header Attacks, and provides step-by-step guidance on testing for these vulnerabilities.

“Penetration Testing: A Hands-On Introduction to Hacking” by Georgia Weidman: This book is aimed at individuals who want to learn how to conduct penetration testing. It includes a chapter on web application security, which covers HTTP Host Header Attacks and other common vulnerabilities.

“Advanced Penetration Testing: Hacking the World’s Most Secure Networks” by Wil Allsopp: This book is aimed at advanced-level readers who want to learn about offensive security. It includes a chapter on web application security, which covers HTTP Host Header Attacks and other common vulnerabilities.

“Mastering Modern Web Penetration Testing” by Prakhar Prasad: This book is aimed at experienced security professionals who want to take their web application security testing to the next level. It includes a chapter on HTTP Host Header Attacks, which provides practical guidance on identifying and exploiting these vulnerabilities.

List of payloads HTTP Host Header Attacks

  1. Malicious domain names: Attackers can craft requests with malicious domain names to trick the server into sending sensitive data to a domain under the attacker’s control.

  2. IP addresses: Attackers can use IP addresses in the Host header to bypass access controls that rely on domain name matching.

  3. Localhost: Attackers can use “localhost” or “127.0.0.1” in the Host header to bypass access controls that restrict access to local services.

  4. URL path traversal: Attackers can use the Host header to perform URL path traversal attacks, allowing them to access files or directories outside of the intended location.

  5. Port scanning: Attackers can use the Host header to scan for open ports on the server.

  6. Cross-site scripting (XSS): Attackers can use the Host header to inject malicious scripts into web pages.

  7. SQL injection: Attackers can use the Host header to inject SQL commands into database queries.

  8. Buffer overflow: Attackers can use the Host header to trigger buffer overflow vulnerabilities in web applications.

  9. File inclusion: Attackers can use the Host header to include arbitrary files on the server.

  10. Server-side request forgery (SSRF): Attackers can use the Host header to trigger SSRF vulnerabilities in web applications, allowing them to make requests to internal or external resources on behalf of the server.

How to be protected from HTTP Host Header Attacks

  1. Validate input: Ensure that all input received by the server is validated and sanitized before being used.

  2. Use strict domain name matching: Ensure that access controls rely on strict domain name matching, and not just the Host header value.

  3. Whitelist allowed domain names: Maintain a whitelist of allowed domain names, and reject requests with domain names not on the list.

  4. Use SSL/TLS: Ensure that all web traffic is encrypted using SSL/TLS, to prevent attackers from intercepting or modifying requests.

  5. Set a default virtual host: Set a default virtual host that will handle all requests with unrecognized domain names, to prevent them from being routed to unintended resources.

  6. Avoid using IP addresses in the Host header: Avoid using IP addresses in the Host header, as this can allow attackers to bypass access controls that rely on domain name matching.

  7. Limit server responses: Limit the amount of information included in server responses, to minimize the risk of sensitive data exposure.

  8. Implement strict access controls: Implement strict access controls to limit the resources that can be accessed based on user permissions.

  9. Keep software up to date: Keep all software and web applications up to date with the latest security patches and updates, to minimize the risk of known vulnerabilities being exploited.

  10. Perform regular security testing: Perform regular security testing, including vulnerability scanning and penetration testing, to identify and address any potential security weaknesses in the system.

Mitigations for HTTP Host Header Attacks

  1. Use a web application firewall (WAF): A WAF can be configured to block requests with invalid Host headers or to filter out requests that contain malicious payloads.

  2. Perform input validation and sanitization: Validate and sanitize input from all sources, including the Host header, to ensure that it contains only expected characters and is not used to execute malicious commands.

  3. Use secure coding practices: Ensure that web application code is written with security in mind, following best practices for secure coding such as using prepared statements, parameterized queries, and stored procedures.

  4. Use HTTPS: Use HTTPS to encrypt all traffic between clients and servers, which can help prevent man-in-the-middle attacks that could modify the Host header in transit.

  5. Use server-side redirection: Use server-side redirection to enforce that all requests are directed to a single, canonical hostname. This can help prevent attacks that rely on requests being processed with different Host headers.

  6. Use subdomain isolation: If possible, isolate different parts of a web application onto different subdomains. This can limit the impact of attacks that exploit the Host header by restricting access to sensitive resources to specific subdomains.

  7. Limit exposure: Limit the exposure of sensitive resources by implementing access control mechanisms and only exposing resources that are necessary for the operation of the application.

Conclusion

HTTP Host header attacks are a type of attack that allows an attacker to modify the Host header in an HTTP request, potentially bypassing security mechanisms that are based on hostname validation. These attacks can be used to launch a wide range of attacks, including cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery, and server-side request forgery.

To protect against these attacks, it is important to implement a combination of mitigations such as using a web application firewall, input validation and sanitization, secure coding practices, using HTTPS, using server-side redirection, subdomain isolation, and limiting exposure.

In addition, it is important to regularly monitor web application logs and network traffic to identify any suspicious activity that may indicate an attack is in progress. By implementing these measures and remaining vigilant, it is possible to reduce the risk of HTTP Host header attacks and protect the security of web applications and their users.

Other Services

Ready to secure?

Let's get in touch