HEAP-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability
Vulnerability Assessment as a Service (VAaaS)
Tests systems and applications for vulnerabilities to address weaknesses.
A HEAP overflow, heap overrun, or heap smashing is a type of buffer overflow that occurs in the heap data area.
The abbreviation for this vulnerability is typically “HEAP-Based buffer overflow”. The full title could be “HEAP Memory-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability”.
A HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerability occurs when a program writes more data to a heap-allocated memory buffer than the buffer is designed to hold. This can cause the buffer to overflow, potentially overwriting adjacent memory and corrupting data. In some cases, this can also lead to remote code execution, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. The vulnerability occurs when the program does not adequately validate the size of user-supplied data before copying it into a heap-allocated buffer, allowing the attacker to write more data than the buffer is designed to hold. To prevent HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, it is important to implement proper input validation and bounds checking, and to use memory-safe programming techniques, such as using languages that automatically handle memory management, such as Rust.
Examples of vulnerable code on different programming languages
• C:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void overflow(char *str) {
// Allocating a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap
char *buffer = malloc(16);
// Copying the string into the buffer
strcpy(buffer, str);
// This is for demonstration purposes only,
// in a real program this memory should be freed
// when it is no longer needed
free(buffer);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
if (argc < 2) {
printf("Usage: %s <string>\n", argv[0]);
return 1;
}
overflow(argv[1]);
return 0;
}
In this example, the overflow function takes a string as an argument and allocates a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap using malloc. It then copies the string into the buffer using the strcpy function. If the length of the string passed as an argument is greater than 16, it will write beyond the bounds of the buffer, causing a heap-based buffer overflow.
• C++:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
void overflow(const std::string &str) {
// Allocating a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap
char *buffer = new char[16];
// Copying the string into the buffer
strncpy(buffer, str.c_str(), 16);
buffer[15] = '\0';
// This is for demonstration purposes only,
// in a real program this memory should be deleted
// when it is no longer needed
delete[] buffer;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
if (argc < 2) {
std::cout << "Usage: " << argv[0] << " <string>" << std::endl;
return 1;
}
overflow(argv[1]);
return 0;
}
In this example, the overflow function takes a string as an argument and allocates a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap using new. It then copies the string into the buffer using the strncpy function, ensuring that the copy will not exceed 16 characters. If the length of the string passed as an argument is greater than 16, it will write beyond the bounds of the buffer, causing a heap-based buffer overflow.
• Python:
def overflow(str):
# Allocating a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap
buffer = bytearray(16)
# Copying the string into the buffer
buffer[0:len(str)] = str
str = input("Enter a string: ")
overflow(str.encode())
In this example, the overflow function takes a string as an argument and creates a bytearray of 16 bytes. It then tries to copy the input
• Java:
import java.util.Arrays;
public class HeapBasedBufferOverflow {
public static void overflow(String str) {
// Allocating a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap
char[] buffer = new char[16];
// Copying the string into the buffer
Arrays.fill(buffer, '\0');
System.arraycopy(str.toCharArray(), 0, buffer, 0, Math.min(str.length(), 16));
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
if (args.length < 1) {
System.out.println("Usage: java HeapBasedBufferOverflow <string>");
return;
}
overflow(args[0]);
}
}
In this example, the overflow function takes a string as an argument and allocates a buffer of 16 characters on the heap using new char[16]. It then copies the string into the buffer using System.arraycopy. If the length of the string passed as an argument is greater than 16, it will write beyond the bounds of the buffer, causing a heap-based buffer overflow.
• JavaScript:
function overflow(str) {
// Allocating a buffer of 16 bytes on the heap
let buffer = new Array(16);
// Copying the string into the buffer
for (let i = 0; i < Math.min(str.length, 16); i++) {
buffer[i] = str[i];
}
}
let str = prompt("Enter a string: ");
overflow(str);
In this example, the overflow function takes a string as an argument and creates an array of 16 elements using new Array(16). It then tries to copy the input string into the buffer. If the length of the string passed as an argument is greater than 16, it will write beyond the bounds of the buffer, causing a heap-based buffer overflow.
Examples of exploitation HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
import java.util.Scanner;
public class ExploitCode {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String payload = "AAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBB";
vulnerable_function(payload);
}
static void vulnerable_function(String input) {
char buffer[] = new char[10];
input.getChars(0, 10, buffer, 0);
System.out.println(buffer);
}
}
In this example, a string called “payload” is created with a length of 20 characters, which is more than the size of the buffer (10 characters) in the vulnerable function. When the vulnerable function is called with this payload, the input.getChars(0, 10, buffer, 0) line copies the first 10 characters of the input string into the buffer, effectively overwriting the remaining 10 characters. This overflow of the buffer can potentially allow an attacker to inject malicious code into the target system.
Privilege escalation techniques Hep-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
Privilege escalation refers to the process of gaining elevated privileges on a system or application, such as administrative or root access, that were not initially granted. In the context of HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, privilege escalation can be achieved by exploiting the vulnerability to execute malicious code with elevated privileges.
Here are some of the most common techniques used to achieve privilege escalation through HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities:
Overwriting Function Pointers: By overflowing a buffer and overwriting the function pointers stored on the heap, an attacker can change the flow of execution and cause the application to call malicious code with elevated privileges.
Overwriting Object Metadata: By overflowing a buffer and overwriting the metadata associated with an object stored on the heap, an attacker can change the behavior of the object and cause the application to execute malicious code with elevated privileges.
Exploiting Use-After-Free (UAF) Vulnerabilities: By causing a heap-allocated object to be freed and then reallocating it with malicious content, an attacker can cause the application to execute malicious code with elevated privileges.
ROP Chain Creation: By overflowing a buffer and creating a return-oriented programming (ROP) chain, an attacker can cause the application to execute a sequence of gadgets with elevated privileges.
It’s important to emphasize that these techniques require a thorough understanding of memory management in the target application, as well as the ability to craft malicious payloads that can bypass any existing security measures.
General methodology and checklist for testing HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
The methodology for testing HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities involves several steps that should be performed in a systematic and thorough manner.
1. Reconnaissance: This step involves gathering information about the target application, its environment, and its components. This information can be obtained through various sources, such as the application’s source code, the software development kit (SDK), or the user manual. The goal of this step is to gain a complete understanding of the application, its design, and its behavior, and to identify potential attack vectors that can be used to exploit HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
2. Vulnerability Mapping: In this step, the tester identifies the potential attack vectors in the target application, such as input fields, system calls, and buffer-handling functions. This is an important step as it helps the tester to focus on the critical areas of the application that are most likely to be vulnerable.
3. Exploitation: This step involves creating and executing malicious payloads to test the target application for vulnerabilities. The payloads can be crafted manually or through automated tools. The goal of this step is to determine whether the target application is vulnerable to HEAP-based buffer overflow attacks and to assess the potential impact of the vulnerability.
4. Verification: In this step, the tester verifies whether the exploitation was successful and determines the impact of the vulnerability. This can be done through code analysis, debugging, or by observing the behavior of the target application. The goal of this step is to gain a complete understanding of the vulnerability, its root cause, and its potential impact on the application and its environment.
5. Reporting: In this final step, the tester documents the results of the testing and provides a detailed report on the vulnerabilities found and the recommended remediation steps. This report should include a description of the vulnerability, its impact, and the steps taken to exploit it. It should also include a clear and concise explanation of the remediation steps that should be taken to mitigate the vulnerability.
Checklist for Testing HEAP-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities:
1. Verify that all inputs are properly sanitized and validated to prevent buffer overflows.
2. Check the length of inputs and ensure that they do not exceed the length of the target buffer.
3. Ensure that all buffers are initialized with safe values and that the memory allocation is properly managed.
4. Check for the use of unsafe functions, such as “strcpy”, that can lead to buffer overflows.
5. Ensure that the code does not have any memory leak issues, as these can be used to manipulate the memory heap.
6. Verify that the code does not have any use-after-free (UAF) vulnerabilities, which can be exploited to execute malicious code.
7. Check that the code is compiled with appropriate security flags and that it is updated to the latest security patches.
8. Verify that the code is designed with robust error handling mechanisms to prevent heap-based buffer overflows.
9. Ensure that the code is tested with different types of inputs, including valid and invalid inputs, to identify potential buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
10. Check that the code is tested on different platforms, with different configurations and settings, to identify platform-specific vulnerabilities.
Useful Tips:
1. Perform a thorough code review to identify areas of the code that are vulnerable to HEAP-based buffer overflows.
2. Use automated tools and scripts to help identify
Tools set for exploiting HEAP-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities
Manual Tools:
GDB: A popular debugger used for manually tracing and analyzing the execution of applications.
Valgrind: An open-source dynamic analysis tool that can detect heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by detecting memory access errors.
EDB (Evan’s Debugger): A GUI-based debugger that supports Linux, Windows, and macOS.
OllyDbg: A popular windows debugger that is widely used for reverse engineering and manual exploitation.
WinDBG: A powerful debugger provided by Microsoft for Windows-based systems.
Immunity Debugger: A GUI-based debugger that is specifically designed for use in the security field.
Radare2: An open-source, cross-platform reverse engineering framework that can be used for manual exploitation.
Ghidra: A free, open-source reverse engineering tool developed by the NSA.
Automated Tools:
AFL (American Fuzzy Lop): A popular coverage-based fuzzer that can be used to find heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
AddressSanitizer: A runtime instrumentation tool that can detect heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in real-time.
LibFuzzer: A fuzzer for C and C++ code, specifically designed for use with the LLVM compiler.
PwnFuzz: A Python-based fuzzer that can be used to find heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
honggfuzz: A general-purpose fuzzer that can be used to find heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
ClangSanitizer: A runtime analysis tool that can detect heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in real-time.
LLVM-Fuzzer: A fuzzer for C and C++ code that is integrated with the LLVM compiler.
AFLSmart: An extension of AFL that uses machine learning to guide the fuzzing process.
Browser Plugins:
AddressSanitizer for Chrome: A browser plugin that uses AddressSanitizer to detect heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in real-time.
WebAssembly Sanitizer: A browser plugin that uses a WebAssembly-based runtime analysis tool to detect heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in real-time.
Fuzz-O-Matic: A browser plugin that uses AFL to find heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in web applications.
Average CVSS score of HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is a widely adopted open industry standard for evaluating the severity of a vulnerability. CVSS assigns a score to a vulnerability based on its potential impact and the ease of exploitation. The CVSS score is determined based on three main categories: Base, Temporal, and Environmental.
The Base score for a HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerability typically ranges from 7.5 to 10.0, with 10.0 being the most severe. The Base score considers factors such as the access required to exploit the vulnerability, the complexity of the attack, and the impact on the affected system. For HEAP-based buffer overflows, the access required is usually “Local,” meaning that the attacker must have access to the affected system to carry out the attack. The complexity of the attack is usually considered to be “Low,” making it relatively easy for an attacker to exploit the vulnerability. The impact on the affected system can range from “Complete Compromise” to “Denial of Service,” depending on the specifics of the vulnerability.
The Temporal score takes into account the current state of the vulnerability, including whether a patch is available and how widely the vulnerability is being exploited. If a patch is available and widely deployed, the Temporal score will be lower, reflecting the lower risk posed by the vulnerability.
The Environmental score takes into account the specifics of the affected system and the environment in which it is deployed. For example, a vulnerability in a critical system used in a high-security environment will result in a higher Environmental score than a vulnerability in a less critical system used in a lower-security environment.
In summary, the average CVSS score for HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities is typically in the range of 7.5 to 10.0, with the exact score depending on the specifics of the vulnerability, the state of the vulnerability, and the environment in which the affected system is deployed.
The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) for HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
This list highlights some of the most common CWEs:
• CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer: This vulnerability occurs when an application performs operations within a memory buffer without proper restrictions, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’): This vulnerability occurs when an application copies data from an input buffer to a fixed-size buffer without properly checking the size of the input, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-121: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow – This vulnerability occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer on the stack than the buffer is capable of storing. This can result in overwriting adjacent memory on the stack, including critical memory such as function pointers or return addresses, which can then be used to redirect program execution to attacker-controlled code. This type of buffer overflow typically occurs in programs that use unbounded string copy functions or other functions that copy data into fixed-sized buffers on the stack without properly checking the size of the input.
• CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow: This vulnerability occurs when an application writes more data to a heap-allocated buffer than it was intended to hold, leading to the overwrite of important data in memory and potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code or crash the application.
• CWE-124: Buffer Underread – This vulnerability occurs when a program reads from a buffer with a size that is smaller than the amount of data being read. This can result in reading from adjacent memory locations, which can lead to sensitive data being leaked or a crash.
• CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read – This vulnerability occurs when a program reads data from a buffer using an index that is outside of the bounds of the buffer. This can result in sensitive data being leaked or a crash.
• CWE-127: Buffer Underwrite (Heap-based): This vulnerability occurs when an application writes less data to a heap-allocated buffer than it was intended to hold, potentially leading to the overwrite of important data in memory.
• CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index: This vulnerability occurs when an application does not properly validate the index used to access elements of an array, potentially leading to a buffer overflow condition.
• CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size: This vulnerability occurs when an application calculates the size of a buffer incorrectly, leading to a buffer overflow condition.
• CWE-134: Uncontrolled Format String: This vulnerability occurs when an application uses an uncontrolled format string in a call to a function that processes format strings, such as printf(). This can lead to a buffer overflow condition.
• CWE-170: Improper Null Termination – This vulnerability occurs when a string in a program is not properly null-terminated, allowing an attacker to read data past the end of the string. This can result in sensitive data being leaked or a crash. The null-termination of a string is used to indicate the end of the string, and not including a null terminator can result in reading data past the end of the string.
• CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound: This vulnerability occurs when an application performs an arithmetic operation that results in an integer overflow or wraparound, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-191: Integer Underflow: This vulnerability occurs when an application performs an arithmetic operation that results in an integer underflow, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-416: Use After Free: This vulnerability occurs when an application continues to use a freed memory block, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference: This vulnerability occurs when an application dereferences a null pointer, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-478: Missing Default Case in Switch Statement: This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a switch statement without a default case, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write: This vulnerability occurs when an application writes data outside of the bounds of a buffer, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
• CWE-788: Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer: This vulnerability occurs when an application accesses a memory location before the start of a buffer, potentially leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
These CWEs describe the different types of HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including those that result from incorrect calculations of buffer sizes, improper validation of array indices, and uncontrolled format strings. Understanding the specific CWEs associated with HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities can help organizations better understand and mitigate the risks posed by these types of vulnerabilities.
Top 10 latests CVE related to HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
• CVE-2023-23582 – Snap One Wattbox WB-300-IP-3 versions WB10.9a17 and prior are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code or crash the device remotely.
• CVE-2023-23456 – A heap-based buffer overflow issue was discovered in UPX in PackTmt::pack() in p_tmt.cpp file. The flow allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (abort) via a crafted file.
• CVE-2023-21605 – Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 22.003.20282 (and earlier), 22.003.20281 (and earlier) and 20.005.30418 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
• CVE-2023-21594 Adobe InCopy versions 18.0 (and earlier), 17.4 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
• CVE-2023-21587 Adobe InDesign version 18.0 (and earlier), 17.4 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
• CVE-2023-0433 – Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.1225.
• CVE-2023-0288 – Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.1189.
• CVE-2023-0051 – Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.1144.
• CVE-2022-48281 – processCropSelections in tools/tiffcrop.c in LibTIFF through 4.5.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow (e.g., “WRITE of size 307203”) via a crafted TIFF image.
• CVE-2022-47942 – An issue was discovered in ksmbd in the Linux kernel 5.15 through 5.19 before 5.19.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in set_ntacl_dacl, related to use of SMB2_QUERY_INFO_HE after a malformed SMB2_SET_INFO_HE command.
The list of CVEs is constantly being updated and full an up-to-date list of all existed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) for HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerabilities can be found at official CVE website https://cve.mitre.org/
List of popular exploits related to HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
Here is a list of some popular exploits related to HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities:
1. House of Spirit – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by creating fake heap chunks and manipulating the heap metadata to overwrite critical data structures.
2. House of Force – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by overwriting the top chunk of the heap, which controls the size of the heap, to redirect program execution to attacker-controlled code.
3. House of Einherjar – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by manipulating the size of chunks in the heap, leading to an overflow in a contiguous chunk.
4. FastBins Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by corrupting the fastbins in the heap and overwriting critical data structures.
5. Unlink Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by manipulating the metadata of chunks in the heap, leading to an overflow in a contiguous chunk.
6. Tcache Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by corrupting the tcache structures in the heap and overwriting critical data structures.
7. Off-by-One Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by overflowing a buffer by one byte, which can be used to overwrite critical data structures.
8. Use-after-Free Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by freeing a heap-allocated chunk and later using a pointer to the freed chunk to overwrite critical data structures.
9. Double Free Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by freeing the same chunk of memory twice, which can be used to overwrite critical data structures.
10. Null Pointer Dereference Attack – This is a heap exploitation technique that exploits heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities by dereferencing a null pointer, which can result in a crash or other unexpected behavior.
These exploits are complex and require a deep understanding of the underlying heap implementation, as well as expertise in exploiting memory-related vulnerabilities.
Practice identifying and exploiting HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
Here are some recommendations for practical study of HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities:
Understanding the basics of computer memory: Before studying heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, it is important to have a good understanding of computer memory and how it works, including the stack and the heap.
Familiarizing yourself with C programming: C is the most common language used to demonstrate heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, and it is important to be familiar with the basics of C programming.
Practicing with a debugger: Debugging is an essential part of exploiting heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, and it is recommended to practice using a debugger such as GDB or OllyDbg to understand how memory is laid out and how to manipulate it.
Studying heap implementation details: Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities are highly dependent on the underlying heap implementation, so it is important to study the details of the heap implementation in the operating system or runtime environment you are interested in.
Practicing with a vulnerable program: There are many programs available that are intentionally vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, and it is recommended to practice exploiting these vulnerabilities to gain hands-on experience. Some popular programs include heap-overflow, bof, and pwntools.
Reading about heap exploitation techniques: There are many different techniques used to exploit heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, and it is recommended to study and understand these techniques, including House of Spirit, House of Force, House of Einherjar, FastBins Attack, Unlink Attack, Tcache Attack, Off-by-One Attack, Use-after-Free Attack, Double Free Attack, and Null Pointer Dereference Attack.
Keeping up with security research: The field of security research is constantly evolving, and new techniques for exploiting heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities are regularly being discovered and published. It is recommended to keep up with the latest security research by following security blogs and attending security conferences.
Remember that practical experience and hands-on learning are the most important aspects of studying heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
Books with review of HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
List of books that you may find helpful in learning about HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities:
“Hacking: The Art of Exploitation” by Jon Erickson: This book provides a comprehensive introduction to heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including the basics of memory management and how to exploit these vulnerabilities.
“The Shellcoder’s Handbook: Discovering and Exploiting Security Holes” by Chris Anley: This book provides a detailed look at heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities and how to exploit them, including in-depth coverage of memory corruption and exploitation techniques.2. “Black Hat Python: Python Programming for Hackers and Pentesters” by Justin Seitz: This book provides a hands-on introduction to heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including how to write exploits and use them to take over vulnerable systems.
“Exploiting Software: How to Break Code” by Greg Hoglund and Gary McGraw: This book provides a comprehensive look at the basics of heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including the underlying theory and practical techniques for exploiting these vulnerabilities.
“Reversing: Secrets of Reverse Engineering” by Eldad Eilam: This book provides a comprehensive overview of heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including the basics of memory management and reverse engineering, as well as in-depth coverage of heap exploitation techniques.
“Gray Hat Python: Python Programming for Hackers and Reverse Engineers” by Justin Seitz: This book provides a comprehensive introduction to heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including how to write exploits and reverse engineer software to identify these vulnerabilities.
“The Web Application Hacker’s Handbook: Finding and Exploiting Security Flaws” by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto: This book provides a comprehensive look at heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities, including how to identify and exploit these vulnerabilities in web applications.
These books provide a good starting point for learning about HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities and can help you build a strong foundation for further study and practical experience.
List of payloads for HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
Shellcode: A small piece of code that is executed directly in the exploited process, typically used to launch a shell or create a reverse shell to give the attacker control over the targeted system.
Return-to-libc: An exploitation technique that redirects the flow of execution to a function in a standard library, typically used to bypass security measures like non-executable stacks or data execution prevention.
JMP ESP: An instruction that jumps to the value stored in the ESP register, often used to redirect the flow of execution to injected shellcode.
ROP (Return-Oriented Programming): An exploitation technique that uses a series of small, pre-existing code gadgets to perform arbitrary computations and bypass security measures like non-executable stacks or data execution prevention.
NULL bytes: Payloads that contain a NULL byte (0x00) to terminate strings or buffers earlier than expected, often used to bypass security measures like string or buffer length checks.
Format string exploitation: An exploitation technique that uses format string specifiers in string formatting functions to manipulate memory and execute arbitrary code.
Overwrite function pointers: Payloads that overwrite function pointers or virtual table entries to redirect the flow of execution to attacker-controlled code.
Heap spraying: An exploitation technique that fills the heap with attacker-controlled data, often used to increase the chances of successfully exploiting a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability.
How to be protected from HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
Best practices and technologies that can be used.
1. Input validation: Ensure that all inputs to your system are validated to ensure they are within expected bounds and do not contain malicious data.
2. Use of secure libraries: Utilize libraries that have been developed with security in mind and have been widely tested and reviewed to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities.
3. Stack canaries: Use stack canaries to detect and prevent stack-based buffer overflows.
4. Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR): Enable ASLR to randomize the memory layout of a program, making it harder for an attacker to predict where vulnerabilities may exist.
5. Data Execution Prevention (DEP): Enable DEP to prevent attackers from executing code from certain areas of memory, such as the heap or stack.
6. Firewall rules: Configure firewall rules to block incoming traffic that may be malicious, such as packets containing known exploits.
7. Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS): Utilize IDS/IPS systems to detect and prevent attacks, including HEAP-based buffer overflow attacks.
8. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems: Use SIEM systems to collect, analyze, and alert on security-related data from various sources, including firewall and IDS/IPS logs.
9. Regular software updates: Keep software updated and patched to address any known vulnerabilities, including HEAP-based buffer overflows.
It is important to note that no single solution can guarantee complete protection against all HEAP-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities. A combination of these and other security measures, along with regular security testing and monitoring, can provide a strong defense against these types of attacks.
Mitigations and how to be protected from HEAP-Based buffer overflow vulnerabilities
1. Input validation: Validate user input before processing it, to prevent attackers from injecting malicious data that could cause a buffer overflow.
2. Data bounds checking: Check the bounds of arrays and buffers to ensure that data is not being written beyond the end of the buffer.
3. Stack protection: Use stack protection techniques, such as stack canaries and stack smashing protection, to help prevent the exploitation of buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
4. Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR): ASLR randomizes the location of memory pages, making it harder for attackers to predict where data and code are located in memory.
5. Data Execution Prevention (DEP): DEP marks certain memory pages as non-executable, so that malicious code injected into memory cannot be executed.
6. Use of safe programming languages: Use programming languages that have built-in protections against buffer overflow exploits, such as Java and Python.
7. Code review: Regularly review and test code for buffer overflow vulnerabilities, and fix any vulnerabilities that are found.
8. Segmentation: Segment code and data into separate areas of memory, making it harder for attackers to control the flow of execution.
Conclusion
HEAP-Based buffer overflow is a type of vulnerability that can lead to dangerous consequences such as arbitrary code execution or information leakage. To avoid this vulnerability, it is crucial to follow secure coding practices, use secure programming languages, utilize security tools, and keep software updated with security patches.
Other Services
Infrastructure Protection by CRYEYE
Security audits via CryEye provide enterprise information security, protecting the entire infrastructure.
Learn more
Penetration Testing
Find vulnerabilities across your entire business infrastructure before hackers do! At penetration testing consulting, we will select pentest methods and other custom cybersecurity recommendations for your business.
Learn more
Social Engineering
Find vulnerabilities across your entire business infrastructure before hackers do! At penetration testing consulting, we will select pentest methods and other custom cybersecurity recommendations for your business.
Learn more
Performance Testing
All kinds of load and performance testing of your system from the CQR online security company.
Learn more